Faulhaber, Brad - HS Social Science
Page Navigation
- Mr. Faulhaber
-
APPLIED GOVERNMENT (4th Quarter: Spring 2024)
- Constitutional Amendment Harkness
- Applied Government
- APPLIED GOVERNMENT (1st Quarter: Fall 2023)
- Applied Government 2022-2023 (First Quarter)
- Applied Government 1st Quarter 2021
- Advanced Gov Videos/Articles
- Applied Government 2022-2023 (2nd Quarter)
- Applied Government-2nd Quarter 2021-2022
- APPLIED GOVERNMENT (2nd Quarter: Fall 2023)
- Applied Government 2nd Semester
- Applied Government-3rd Quarter
- Applied Government (3rd Quarter-2023)
- Applied Government: 4th quarter 2022
- APPLIED GOVERNMENT (4th Quarter 2023)
- APPLIED GOVERNMENT (2nd Quarter: Fall 2023)
- APPLIED GOVERNMENT (3rd Quarter: Spring 2024)
- CIVIL LAW: FALL 2023
- Constitutional Law SPRING 2024
- CRIMINAL LAW SPRING 2024
- Foundations of Government-SPRING 2024
- Leadership Class
- Parties, Politics, and Political Participation: Voting, Campaigning, and Participation
- Psychology: Its Origins and its Schools
- Social and Developmental Psychology (SPIRNG 2024)
- APC
- How a C-grade college term paper led to a constitutional amendment
- Guide to Turning 18: Legal Rights and Responsibilities in Montana of 18 Year-Olds
- Montana Boys State
- Civics Knowledge
- Civic Discourse
-
Debates
- Affirmative Action Harkness
- Are Social Media Sites, Public Forums?
- Arming Teachers
- Columbus Day/Indigenous People Day
- National or Community Service Debate
- Compulsory Vaccines
- DACA
- DAPL Debate
- Drug Testing for Welfare
- Drug War
- Education Reform
- Equal Pay
- Feminism
- Free College
- Gay Marriage
- Green New Deal
- Hunting Endangered Animals
- Minimum Wage Debate
- Monuments Debate
- N-Word
- National Anthem Protests
- Pledge
- Pre-K Policy Debate
- Redskin Name
- Right to Die Debate
- Sanctuary Cities
- Social Media
- Sugary Drinks
- Supreme Court Harkness
- Syrian Refugees: Who Controls Immigration
- Teen Drinking
- Term Limits Harkness
- The Case Against High-School Sports
- Cell Phones in Schools
- Marijuana Debate
-
Moot Courts
- Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. American Humanist Association
- Carpenter v. United States
- Masterpiece Bakery: Gay Wedding Cakes
- Arizona v. United States
- Kelo v. New London
- Roper v. Simmons
- HHS v. Florida Moot Court
- McCullen v. Coakley Abortion Clinic Buffer Zones
- Morse v. Frederick
- Florida v. Jardines
- Fisher v. Texas
- Bourke v. Beshear Gay Marriage Case
- US v. Jones
- Burwell v. Hobby Lobby
- "Slant Eyes" Court Case: Lee v. Tam
- United States v. Texas
- McCullen v. Coakley
- THE BLADENSBURG PEACE CROSS CASE
- America's Founding
- Second Amendment Podcast
- Congress
- Constitution Day
- Steven Spielberg Commencement Address
- Federalism
- The Judicial Branch
- The Presidency
- Democracy 3 Tutorial
- APPLIED GOVERNMENT (4th Quarter: Spring 2024) II
- Sidney Public Schools
- Debates
- Supreme Court Harkness
-
Should federal judges and Supreme Court justices have term limits? Annenberg Speakout
“Quasi-monarchial judicial tenure makes it less likely that turnover will lead to reconsideration of erroneous or unpopular constitutional rulings. This feeds doubts about the legitimacy of those rulings among voters and elected officials who feed disenfranchised. People may become less willing to comply if they come to see the justices as enfeebles relics of another era.”
-Stuart Taylor, Jr., “Life Tenure Is Too Long for Supreme Court Justices,” The Atlantic
Summarize this excerpt from an article in The Atlantic about life tenure granted to Supreme Court justices. Do you think the author is for or against term limits for Supreme Court justices? Do you agree or disagree with the author’s point of view? Why or why not?